Connecting countries to climate technology solutions
English Arabic Chinese (Simplified) French Russian Spanish Yoruba

Riparian buffer

CTCN
Objective:
Impacts addressed:
Technology:
Maturity:

Riparian buffers are vegetated, often forested, areas (“strips”) adjacent to streams, rivers, lakes and other waterways protecting aquatic environments from the impacts of surrounding land use. To the extent possible riparian buffers should compose of native species and typically are divided in three zones with a total width of 15 to 200 meters. The first zone should consist of different grasses, a middle zone planted with bushes and a last part with large trees.

Riparian buffers help to maintain water quality in waterways by protecting streams from non-point source pollution. Riparian vegetation cover prevents sediments, as well as such pollutants as nitrogen, phosphorus and others from entering water through biological and physical-chemical processes. Vegetation and tree roots also stabilize banks and prevent erosion. Of special importance especially for developing countries is that riparian buffers during flood events help to slow down runoff by absorbing excess water, reduces peak flows and help to mitigate potential flood damage downstream.

Benefits:
  • Reducing risks of eutrophication problems and preventing water pollution (particularly from agricultural activities)
  • Erosion reduction
  • Mitigation of flood damages
  • Retaining sediments
  • Help in maintaining the aquatic environment by reducing water temperature fluctuations
Co-benefits:

Jobs would be created for the local communities not only in the creation of the buffer zones (growing trees) but also in the policing and protection of the zones.

Local communities could also invest in growing fruit trees as part of the buffer and harvest the fruits later for extra income.

Reduce public and private expenditures on climate related disaster management such as flooding from rivers overflowing the banks.

Differentiators:

The use of riparian buffers to prevent nutrient leakage does not require large scale changes in land use and is relatively low-cost solution (compared to other approaches such as implementation of land use limitations or the construction of artificial wetlands for water purification). Relatively low cost solution.

Working principles:

The use of riparian buffer zones to reduce nutrient leakage operates making use of the natural ability of plants and trees to uptake nutrients present in the water. Riparian buffers help to reduce flood control through the combination of absorbing and slowing the flow of the runoff water.

Barriers:
  • In some countries riverine land could be private
  • Higher pollution leakages require broader buffers
  • Challenges in highly urbanized environments
Succes factors and requirements:
  • National/federal/municipal regulations requiring preservation of buffer zones
  • Access to land (regulatory requirements or alternative arrangements on private lands
  • Subsidies to private owners to stablish and maintain riparian buffers may be required
  • Awareness raising activities to e.g. farmers associations
  • Buffer zones need to be continuous (long strips) for maximum efficiency
Investments required:

The cost of establishing a riparian buffer will depend greatly in the extent required. Wider buffer zones are likely to provide more benefits in terms of preventing nutrient leakage, flood protection and erosion control. The costs would depend on a number of factors, though primarily on the extent of the riparian buffer zones required to meet the wRM objective, the present and planned land use and land ownership arrangements.

Timeframe:

The timeframe depends greatly in the native species chosen to establish the riparian buffers, but usually fast growing species are used. Although the complete establishment of riparian buffers could take several years, water management benefits could be observed from the first year of establishment.

Traditional knowledge:

Riparian buffers can be considered a traditional technology in the sense that in many cases the establishment of riparian buffers involves restoration of degraded riverine zones that were maintained before more active uses of the riverine zone.

Countries where implemented:
Kenya
Case story of implementation:

A good example could be Sweden, where riparian buffers have been used extensively to reduce nutrient leakage from agricultural fields. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4329156/

Example from Kenya: https://www.wocat.net/fileadmin/user_upload/.../Fischer2014.pdf

Content organisation: