Network member
Technology sector
Cross-sectoral
Focal point email
Problem
Developing countries face a profound and compounding challenge: simultaneously accelerate economic growth and social development, manage natural resources sustainably, and meet ambitious climate commitments under the Paris Agreement, often with limited institutional capacity and constrained public budgets. The complexity of these interacting systems makes it exceptionally difficult for governments and planners to design effective climate and development strategies. Specifically:
- Climate action plans are frequently developed in sector-specific silos, missing critical economy-wide feedback loops and cross-sectoral synergies.
- Governments lack accessible tools to rigorously test how different technology adoption pathways will affect economic growth, employment, poverty, energy access, and GHG emissions simultaneously and over multi-decade horizons.
- Decision-makers cannot easily visualize trade-offs between competing priorities, for example, whether accelerating renewable energy deployment will crowd out social spending, or how climate-smart agriculture investments translate into long-run food security improvements.
- Without evidence-based projections, climate finance requests to international bodies are often weakly substantiated, reducing the probability of securing funding and implementation support.
- Post-implementation, there is limited capacity to monitor whether development and climate pathways are on track and to course-correct based on real data.
Existing analytical approaches fall short: sector-specific models (e.g., energy system models, crop yield models) omit inter-sectoral dynamics, while standard macroeconomic models exclude the social and environmental dimensions critical to climate planning. This analytical gap results in poorly integrated national strategies, misallocated investment, and missed opportunities to achieve the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals together.
This problem is most acute in Least Developed Countries, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and high-vulnerability nations in Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and Latin America, precisely the countries most at risk from climate change and least equipped to manage it.
- Climate action plans are frequently developed in sector-specific silos, missing critical economy-wide feedback loops and cross-sectoral synergies.
- Governments lack accessible tools to rigorously test how different technology adoption pathways will affect economic growth, employment, poverty, energy access, and GHG emissions simultaneously and over multi-decade horizons.
- Decision-makers cannot easily visualize trade-offs between competing priorities, for example, whether accelerating renewable energy deployment will crowd out social spending, or how climate-smart agriculture investments translate into long-run food security improvements.
- Without evidence-based projections, climate finance requests to international bodies are often weakly substantiated, reducing the probability of securing funding and implementation support.
- Post-implementation, there is limited capacity to monitor whether development and climate pathways are on track and to course-correct based on real data.
Existing analytical approaches fall short: sector-specific models (e.g., energy system models, crop yield models) omit inter-sectoral dynamics, while standard macroeconomic models exclude the social and environmental dimensions critical to climate planning. This analytical gap results in poorly integrated national strategies, misallocated investment, and missed opportunities to achieve the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals together.
This problem is most acute in Least Developed Countries, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and high-vulnerability nations in Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and Latin America, precisely the countries most at risk from climate change and least equipped to manage it.
Solution
The Integrated Sustainable Development (iSD) model is a systems dynamics-based computational framework purpose-built to address the complexity of sustainable development and climate planning in developing countries. It enables governments, planners, researchers, and international development partners to model long-term national development pathways, rigorously test policy and technology scenarios, and identify optimal investment strategies that simultaneously advance climate mitigation, climate adaptation, and development goals.
The iSD model integrates three interconnected domains (economy, society, environment) in a single quantitative framework. Using system dynamics methodology - causal loop diagrams, stocks, flows, and feedback mechanisms - the model simulates how changes in one domain cascade through all others over a 20–50 year horizon. This allows users to test questions such as: "If this country doubles its investment in solar energy, how will that affect employment, government revenue, CO2 emissions, and rural energy access by 2050?" or "What combination of climate-smart agriculture, reforestation, and energy efficiency policies best satisfies both the NDC targets and food security goals?"
The iSD model is directly transferable to any developing country with sufficient data availability and institutional interest. The Millennium Institute provides the model, training, technical facilitation, and documentation, building lasting in-country analytical capacity.
The iSD model integrates three interconnected domains (economy, society, environment) in a single quantitative framework. Using system dynamics methodology - causal loop diagrams, stocks, flows, and feedback mechanisms - the model simulates how changes in one domain cascade through all others over a 20–50 year horizon. This allows users to test questions such as: "If this country doubles its investment in solar energy, how will that affect employment, government revenue, CO2 emissions, and rural energy access by 2050?" or "What combination of climate-smart agriculture, reforestation, and energy efficiency policies best satisfies both the NDC targets and food security goals?"
The iSD model is directly transferable to any developing country with sufficient data availability and institutional interest. The Millennium Institute provides the model, training, technical facilitation, and documentation, building lasting in-country analytical capacity.
Performance and impacts
The iSD model has been applied in more than 20 developing countries across Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Pacific. Deployments have supported the development of National Development Strategies, NDC enhancement processes, Long-Term Low-Emission Development Strategies (LT-LEDS), and green economy transition plans. Selected country-level outcomes include:
In support of Zambia's 2025 National Human Development Report, the model was used to assess how climate change affects Zambia's development goals and how targeted interventions can improve outcomes. The model compared a business-as-usual Baseline against a Climate Resilience Scenario (CRS) aligned with Zambia's NDC and National Green Growth Strategy. Key findings: full implementation of the CRS improves Zambia's Human Development Index by 3% by 2050, with gains in life expectancy, education, and income; accelerates SDG progress in poverty reduction, hunger alleviation, and clean energy; delivers stronger GDP growth and employment; boosts agricultural productivity and food security; diversifies energy supply through renewable sources; and reduces greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation.
The model was applied to develop integrated tools for policy analysis and modeling of the transboundary air pollution challenge affecting Chiang Rai, Thailand and Vientiane, Laos. The project identified that tackling air pollution requires a comprehensive approach addressing all major emission sources simultaneously, including waste, cookstoves, transport, and industry. Key recommendations included prioritizing cost-effective interventions such as improved waste management and clean cookstoves, addressing cross-border emission sources through regional cooperation, accounting for seasonal variations from forest fires and agricultural burning, and improving provincial-scale data collection to strengthen future model projections and policy design.
The model was used to evaluate the impact of green hydrogen (GH2) on the SDGs across three countries with strong green hydrogen potential. In Brazil, results show that a green hydrogen economy can improve SDG performance, with education investment identified as essential for sector growth. In Namibia, robust green hydrogen investment can improve performance on 14 out of 17 SDGs, though high shipping costs for green ammonia exports require subsidy and carbon pricing support to become competitive. In South Africa, where SDG progress largely remains off track, a green hydrogen policy could accelerate progress, particularly by replacing fossil fuels in coal-based sectors and strengthening energy resilience.
In support of Zambia's 2025 National Human Development Report, the model was used to assess how climate change affects Zambia's development goals and how targeted interventions can improve outcomes. The model compared a business-as-usual Baseline against a Climate Resilience Scenario (CRS) aligned with Zambia's NDC and National Green Growth Strategy. Key findings: full implementation of the CRS improves Zambia's Human Development Index by 3% by 2050, with gains in life expectancy, education, and income; accelerates SDG progress in poverty reduction, hunger alleviation, and clean energy; delivers stronger GDP growth and employment; boosts agricultural productivity and food security; diversifies energy supply through renewable sources; and reduces greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation.
The model was applied to develop integrated tools for policy analysis and modeling of the transboundary air pollution challenge affecting Chiang Rai, Thailand and Vientiane, Laos. The project identified that tackling air pollution requires a comprehensive approach addressing all major emission sources simultaneously, including waste, cookstoves, transport, and industry. Key recommendations included prioritizing cost-effective interventions such as improved waste management and clean cookstoves, addressing cross-border emission sources through regional cooperation, accounting for seasonal variations from forest fires and agricultural burning, and improving provincial-scale data collection to strengthen future model projections and policy design.
The model was used to evaluate the impact of green hydrogen (GH2) on the SDGs across three countries with strong green hydrogen potential. In Brazil, results show that a green hydrogen economy can improve SDG performance, with education investment identified as essential for sector growth. In Namibia, robust green hydrogen investment can improve performance on 14 out of 17 SDGs, though high shipping costs for green ammonia exports require subsidy and carbon pricing support to become competitive. In South Africa, where SDG progress largely remains off track, a green hydrogen policy could accelerate progress, particularly by replacing fossil fuels in coal-based sectors and strengthening energy resilience.